This year’s British Society for Refractive Surgery (BSRS) Conference took place on the first hot and steamy weekend of July, and 100 delegates gathered at St Catherine’s College, Oxford, for a jam-packed programme.
The programme kicked off with a talk from Dr Alison Finlay (City University) on ‘Binocular vision and refractive surgery’. This is an area which perhaps has not been considered enough in patient selection for surgery and, therefore, provided stimulating material for future decisions and management. Finlay discussed how refractive surgery can be used to treat a pre-existing problem, how a BV anomaly can affect the surgical results and how it can cause or exacerbate a BV problem.
She described how accommodative esotropias can be treated successfully with refractive surgery. Aniseikonia cannot be predicted and contact lens trials should be considered for high anisometropes.
Cyclotorsion in high astigmats is also often found postoperatively. Refraction and topographical mapping both monocularly and binocularly can help prevent these errors. Problems with manifest squints, including microtropia, can be avoided by preventing change in ocular dominance. Density of suppression and size of suppression scotoma should also be considered. For problems with incomitancy, Finlay suggests avoiding swapping fixation.
Finally, don’t assume patients are orthophoric. Ensure preoperative refraction does not have refractive control of phoria or prescribed prisms. She would recommend a full orthoptic examination if the patient has history of eye exercises, strabismus surgery, amblyopia therapy or prisms.
Professor Joseph Colin
Intacs are indicated for patients with clear central corneas who are contact lens intolerant. They are not indicated for corneas under 450µm or over 55D steep. Intacs, as a rule, are inserted into the anterior stroma through a narrow temporal channel incision. Depending on the clinical situation, one or more rings may be used, but it is most typical to use a ring inferiorly, giving a supportive effect. In his study of 100 eyes, 70 per cent showed improved visual outcome, and the majority remained stable for two years postoperatively. It is also possible to combine Intacs with other refractive procedures to improve vision once the patient is stable.
Next, ophthalmologist
Keith Bates (Somerset) chaired a session on intraocular lenses. IOLs are increasingly an integral part of refractive surgery. The symposium addressed the issue of IOL options to be used in conjunction with refractive lens surgery and in particular compared and contrasted the relative advantages of multifocal versus focus shift lenses. Bates started the symposium with an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of refractive lens surgery compared to corneal refractive surgery, and the broad features of the different IOLs available.
The Law
Later that afternoon
Steven Bailey (London) reported on 150 medico-legal cases in refractive surgery. A remarkable 65 per cent of the claims included issues of consent.In one third of these, the claimant had particular risk factors, for which especially careful counselling was warranted. Other cases included claims where there were clear contraindications to surgery (29 per cent), cases where there was surgical error (24 per cent), avoidable delay in instituting medical management for postoperative complications (23 per cent) and a small proportion of cases were precipitated by a second opinion where the clinician giving the opinion was not fully conversant with the facts (4 per cent).
Bailey concluded by saying that the number of claims could be substantially reduced by:
◆
Initiating proper policies for consent with full documentation throughout the process◆
Ensuring that surgeons are adequately trained in evaluating preoperative tests and allowing surgeons adequate time to assess patients prior to surgery. This includes training of optometrists where they are carrying out a delegated function◆
Moderating the case load for surgery◆
Ensuring patients have easy access to medical care post surgery.On the positive side, however, many of these cases date back to times when these factors were not so carefully considered by clinics as is frequently the case now. Potential forthcoming changes to the training of surgeons discussed by BSRS
president Christopher Liu in the Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ Working Party update, should mean in time we will continue to see improvements.Professor Dan Reinstein
focused on ‘Artemis’ scanning and its safety benefits in refractive surgery selection and management. The ultra-high frequency scanning of the Artemis allows measurement of the cornea and anterior chamber to an amazing 1µm accuracy, which means that all layers of the cornea can be accurately analysed.The Artemis means that flap thickness can truly be analysed post-Lasik, and residual stromal bed accurately predicted, meaning safer outcomes for patients.
Screening for ectasia
Professor Colin delivered a talk on post-Lasik ectasia which occurs in anything between one in 10,000 and one in 300 cases, the lower rate for centres where careful screening is carried out and the higher figure where ‘anyone is suitable’.
Treatment options for kerectasia now include Intacs as well as the more conventional refractive corrections and corneal transplants, including lamellar and full thickness grafts. This was followed by a much anticipated and exciting debate on the femtosecond laser microkeratome versus the mechanical microkeratome.
The BSRS was proud to welcome two eminent speakers to fight for each side:
Ventor argued that mechanical microkeratomes caused abrasions, hydrated interfaces, problems with button hole and inconsistent flap dimensions.
With the Intralase there is a smooth plane. The tissue cutting is non-thermal and the flap can be designed in terms of flap direction, hinge angle, position and thickness. Centration can also be changed, and there is standardisation of flap thickness. Induction of root mean square of higher order aberrations was 0.7 with the Hansotome, but only 0.3 with the Intralase. Ventor acknowledged that there were some new complications, however, with the Intralase, such as difficulty uplifting the flap, bubbles under the flap, opacities and keratitis. However, he concluded that its versatility, predictability and stability indicated that it is the microkeratome of the future.
Gartry focused on the long history and evolution of mechanical microkeratomes, claiming that like must be compared with like and the Intralase should only be compared with the most modern design of mechanical keratome. He then focused on the lengthy time it takes to create a flap using the femtosecond, three minutes 10 seconds compared with 30 seconds for the microkeratome. This creates a greater risk of suction loss in addition to other problems. A 13 per cent incidence of DLK with the Intralase has been reported
Other complications include extreme photophobia requiring steroids and gas bubble escape into the anterior chamber. Gartry also argued that with modern microkeratomes, flap thickness was equally predictable. A planned 120µm flap gave a mean of 111µm in 34 cases using the Bausch & Lomb XP, whereas with the Intralase the same gave a thickness of 141.
In summary, Gartry argued that the relative cost of the Intralase was far too great, the treatment time was simply too long and there were too many new, unknown complications. The audience were then asked to vote, and on this time the mechanical microkeratome won.
This year the BSRS were delighted to welcome
Dr Cynthia Roberts from the US, whose special interest was in corneal biomechanics in glaucoma. For her first talk, Roberts discussed the importance of the corneal biomechanical response in refractive surgery, stating that it offers an explanation for induced aberrations, particularly spherical.In the periphery of the cornea, loss of ablation efficiency may form a component of the induction of spherical aberration, but this does not explain the difference in response between surface ablations and Lasik. Furthermore, the artefact in IOP measurement induced by refractive surgery has been assumed to result from a decrease in curvature and thickness during myopic procedures. Clinical evidence points to the fundamental change in biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ablative procedure.
Finally, Dr Roberts mentioned that the ability to measure properties preoperatively offers the possibility to predict the biomechanical response and potentially compensate for it, leading to potential biomechanical customisation in the next generation of refractive surgery.
Contact Lenses
(private practice) with a special interest in orthokeratology (OK) for over 10 years, pointed out that OK is often a choice for patients who are tired of glasses and contact lenses but who do not wish to take the step into refractive surgery.Bloom described the variety of lenses now available. Interestingly, even documenting the uses of silicone hydrogel lenses in reverse as an OK lens, an effect that was found quite by mistake. The importance of thorough topography readings and interpretation was demonstrated. Bloom stressed that OK is a time-consuming method of contact lens correction but can be extremely rewarding for the practitioner.
Chris Steele
(Sunderland) spoke on contact lens fitting post-refractive surgery. Steele stated that despite recent advances in refractive surgery a small number of patients do not achieve optimal results and may require contact lenses. These fittings can be challenging for psycho-social as well as practical reasons. Steele concentrated on fitting post Lasik patients. In many cases, routine fitting principles apply, but fitting an oblate rather than prolate cornea can cause new challenges. In a number of cases, rigid lenses provide the only viable correction, and can be more complex as a conventional lens cannot follow the shape of both the flattened central cornea and the relatively steeper periphery in high corrections. Computerised topography is essential for accurate fitting and the use of reverse geometry lenses will apply.However, for the majority of patients, post-refractive surgery lens fitting is not so challenging, and may be used simply to balance an intended monovision correction for night driving for example.
Liu closed the meeting and delegates departed homewards loaded with much thought-provoking information.
◆
Emma Firmager is vice president of the British Society for Refractive Surgery![]() | Providing exclusive eye care news, information and educational needs every week, including a FREE CET programme. Subscribe to Optician Print Edition. |
Optician and its sister company Elsevier have teamed up to provide Optician readers with a 10 per cent discount on Elsevier's optometry titles. Click through to buy online.