I am not often moved to comment on rivals but I was shocked and dismayed by OT 's decision last week to publish a story about a 19 year old woman posing naked in adverts for an optician.
Not only did OT not specify if she was a registered optometrist but they didn't publish the advert in question.
If you are going to indulge in that sort of tawdry, gutter journalism at least publish the pictures of the woman in the buff.
If you want to see Sara Nicoletti's pose please carry on reading....
Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but the last time I checked on Studland Beach, naked meant without clothing. Here we have an image of an attractive lady wearing a bikini bottom. That means she is not naked. Perhaps you should take advantage of a local optometrists time, and have an eye examination. That way, you may come to recognise the differences between clothed i.e, the body is adorned with an item of clothing, and naked, when clearly it is not.
Her chest is naked. Clearly you are an optometrist with a lot of time on your hands to pedantically make such a pointless comment.