Features

Silicone hydrogel performance across recommended replacement intervals

Lenses
Sheila Hickson-Curran highlights the results of a recent multi-centre clinical study that evaluated subjective and objective differences between two reusable silicone hydrogel lenses with different replacement intervals

View PDF 

 Get adobe

In vitro studies also suggest that the performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses may decline over time,4,5 but clinical studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

A study, recently conducted in the US, was designed to test two silicone hydrogel contact lenses with different replacement intervals and compare their performance, as well as to determine how each lens' performance changes over the manufacturer's recommended life of the lens.

Leading silicone hydrogel lenses studied

In a multicentre, subject-masked study, 18- to 45-year-old successful spherical soft contact lens wearers were randomised to wear either a senofilcon A lens with a recommended replacement interval of two weeks (Acuvue Oasys with Hydraclear Plus, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care) or a lotrafilcon B lens with a recommended replacement interval of one month (Air Optix Aqua, Alcon). All subjects signed written informed consent forms, and the study received Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov.6

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Optician Online. Register now to access up to 10 news and opinion articles a month.

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here