Is the decision to split the General Optical Council into three separate directorates totally unconnected with the sustained and aggressive attacks it has been subjected to in recent months?
I would suggest the decision has come as a direct result of the brickbats thrown in the direction of Harley Street and the unwillingness of the individuals in office to put up with the abuse.
The move to structure the Council into three divisions (see news) to see through its five-year plan is a pragmatic solution to the problem of senior staff turnover, but what effect will the move make to the relationship it has with the profession?
Optics prides itself on being a mutually supportive profession. Sometimes, as has happened with fees, painful decisions have to be made, and those at the receiving end are entitled to voice their displeasure. But there is a big difference between the sensibilities of politicians and businessmen and some of those in office at associations and regulators.
The inclusive and consultative approach taken by the GOC of late reflected its character. A more businesslike approach might make that one of the first casualties of structural change.
A directorate approach will separate tactical fulfilment from executive strategic decision-making, while a robust character at the helm might be more forceful in their regulation of the profession. Many of the GOC's detractors have called for change in Harley Street. Be careful what you wish for.